|
Glucosamine and Chondroitin for Arthritis Pain by Jeffrey Dach M.D.
The NIH GAIT Study (1)(2)
As usual, the New York Times and the rest of the media got the story wrong.(4) Rather than being ineffective, as the media concluded about glucosamine and chondroitin for knee pain, the NIH GAIT study actually showed the opposite.(3) Glucosamine and Chondroitin are nutritional supplements that have no adverse side effects. Annual glucosamine sales have increased considerably over the last 10 years (see chart at right). Sales have increased from 1 million dollars a year in 1995 to 700 million dollars a year in 2005.
Right Image Courtesy of New York Times, 10 year annual Glucosamine/ Chondroitin Sales increasing yearly from 1995 to 2005
Glucosamine More Effective than Celebrex
Contrary to the New York Times report, the NIH Gait study actually showed that in patients with moderate-to-severe knee-pain, the combination of the two supplements (glucosamine and chondroitin) was more effective than both Celebrex and a placebo. The glucosamine-chondroitin combination significantly reduced pain in 79 percent of those who received it. Celebrex significantly reduced pain in 69 percent of the recipients and the placebo in 54 percent.(1)(2)(15) The real conclusion is that regarding patients with moderate to severe knee pain, the less costly glucosamine and chondroitin combination is more effective than Celebrex.(3)(15)
Financial Ties to the Drug Industry Lead to Biased Results
How is it possible for the New York Times to get the wrong story? Could it be possible that the authors of the New England Journal reporting the GAIT findings were biased in favor of the drug Celebrex, and against the supplements?(15) Jay Gordon MD raises this question in his article, "Did You Understand the Arthritis Study? I Did."(16) Dr Gordon points out that the authors received financial rewards from the competitive companies making the arthritis drug Celebrex. This conflict of interests biased the authors to spin the results in favor of the drug and against the glusosamine.
Here's a complete list of the disclosure of financial ties the study's authors have to the drug industry:
Drs. Bingham, Brandt, Clegg, Hooper, and Schnitzer report having received consulting fees or having served on advisory boards for McNeil Consumer and Specialty Pharmaceuticals. Drs. Brandt, Moskowitz, Schnitzer, and Schumacher report having received consulting fees or having served on advisory boards for Pfizer. Dr. Brandt reports having equity interests in Pfizer. Drs. Moskowitz and Weisman report having received lecture fees from Pfizer; Dr. Brandt, lecture fees from McNeil Consumer and Specialty Pharmaceuticals; Drs. Bingham, Clegg, Hooper, Jackson, Molitor, Sawitzke, and Schnitzer, grant support from Pfizer; and Dr. Bingham, grant support from McNeil Consumer and Specialty Pharmaceuticals. Dr. Brandt reports having received royalties from books related to osteoarthritis. Dr. Moskowitz reports having served as an expert consultant for Pfizer. None of the authors received any money from makers of glucosamine or chondroitin.
What is Glucosamine ?
Glucosamine and chondroitin sulfate are substances found naturally in the body. Glucosamine is a form of amino sugar that is used for cartilage formation and repair. Chondroitin sulfate is part of a large protein molecule (proteoglycan) that gives cartilage elasticity. Both glucosamine and chondroitin sulfate are sold as dietary or nutritional supplements available at the health food store without the need for a prescription. Glucosamine is a less expensive and safer alternative to NSAID pain pills which are commonly prescribed for arthritis pain.(14)
Safety of Glucosamine/ Chondroitin Compared to the Safety of NSAIDS, Adverse Side Effects of Celebrex
The media stories on the GAIT Study also fail to mention the fact that Glucosamine and Chondroitin have no adverse side effects, while Celebrex causes gastric bleeding, ulceration and death. This is an important distinction. Celebrex is a NSAID pain pill. NSAID drugs are similar to aspirin, ibuprofen, and naproxen. It has been estimated conservatively that 16,500 NSAID-related deaths occur among patients with rheumatoid arthritis or osteoarthritis every year in the United States.
Deaths Reported from Celebrex
On 4/20/99, The Wall Street Journal reported that celecoxib (Celebrex) has been linked to 10 deaths and 11 cases of gastrointestinal hemorrhages. Five of the 10 who died suffered from gastrointestinal bleeding or ulcers.(5)(6)
On December 17, 2004 Pfizer publicly announced that patients who are taking Celebrex may have an elevated risk of suffering heart attack and stroke. The National Cancer Institute designed a study to research the effects of Celebrex on cancer. This Pfizer-sponsored study was suspended after preliminary evidence showed that clinical trial patients who were taking 400 to 800 milligrams of Celebrex were two and a half times more likely to suffer from heart attack or cardiovascular stroke than patients in the control group.
Celebrex No Safer than the Older NSAIDS
An editorial published in the British Medical Journal reports that COX-2 selective painkillers (Like Celebrex and Vioxx) are no safer on your stomach than traditional painkillers.(7) When COX-2 drugs like Celebrex were introduced to the market, their makers claimed these drugs were as effective and much safer than the older NSAID drugs. In other words, they were easier on the stomach. Older NSAIDs, such as Aleve and Naproxen, are known to cause adverse gastrointestinal side effects like ulcers and bleeding. The authors of this BMJ editoral say that the original studies were flawed and that the new COX-2 drugs like Celebrex and Vioxx are just as dangerous as older NSAID drugs.(7)(8)
Annual Death Rate for NSAIDS
The following are the references for the estimated annual death rate from NSAIDs (Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs including aspirin, ibuprofen, naproxen, diclofenac, ketoprofen, and tiaprofenic acid.) How many of these deaths are due to Celebrex vs. the others NSAIDs? Compare this number of deaths to ZERO deaths from glucosamine and chondroitin.
Each year, there are an estimated 103,000 hospitalizations and 16,500 deaths in the United States attributed to complications from NSAID-associated gastric ulcers.(9)(10) Another medical report says there are 7,600 deaths and 76,000 hospitalizations in the United States annually form adverse side effects from NSAID drugs, mostly gastric bleeding. (NSAIDs include aspirin, ibuprofen, naproxen, diclofenac, ketoprofen, and tiaprofenic acid.) Compare this number of deaths to ZERO deaths from glucosamine and chondroitin.(11)(12)
According to November 2004 Congressional testimony by Dr. David Graham, associate director for science and medicine in the FDA's Office of Drug Safety, there were 160,000 heart attacks and as many as 55,000 patients may have died as a result of taking Vioxx. (13)
Left Image David Graham Courtesy of the New York Times
Glucosamine and Chondroitin is a SAFER ALTERNATIVE to NSAIDS
The entire point of the above is to demonstrate the safety profile of glucosamine and chondroitin as compared to the dangers of NSAIDS. Glucosamine and chondroitin are nutritional supplements available without a prescription at the vitamin store, most drugstores, and grocery stores.
Financial Disclosure: Our office provides high quality glucosamine supplements to our clinic patients at a small markup to cover our costs. Other than that, I have no financial interest in any products mentioned in this article.
Jeffrey Dach MD 4700 Sheridan Suite T Hollywood,Fl 33021 www.drdach.com www.truemedmd.com www.jeffreydach.com www.naturalmedicine101.com
References:
(1) http://nccam.nih.gov/research/results/gait/qa.htm NIH GAIT STUDY
(2) http://nccam.nih.gov/research/results/gait/ NIH GAIT STUDY RESULTS
(3) http://www.drtheo.com/news/ The Glucosamine/Chondroitin Arthritis Intervention Trial (GAIT) Results, Commentary and Analysis by (Jason Theodosakis, MD, MS, MPH, FACPM) Member of the Study's Oversight Steering Committee
(4) http://www.nytimes.com/2006/02/23/health/23arthritis.html?ex=1298350800&en=8f65c5d34299201d&ei=5088&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss Supplements Fail to Stop Arthritis Pain, Study Says By GINA KOLATA New York Times February 23, 2006
(5) http://implants.clic.net/tony/Corner/H/0401.html April 20, 1999 Monsanto's Superaspirin Celebrex Has Been Linked to Several Deaths By ROCHELLE SHARPE Staff Reporter of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL WASHINGTON
(6) http://www.hopkins-arthritis.org/arthritis-news/1999/comments.html John Hopkins Arthritis Information Web Site: On 4/20/99, The Wall Street Journal reported that celecoxib (Celebrex) has been linked to 10 deaths and 11 cases of gastrointestinal hemorrhages. Five (four men age 45-88 and one woman age 75) of the 10 who died suffered from gastrointestinal bleeding or ulcers.
(7) http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/324/7349/1287 BMJ 2002;324:1287-1288 ( 1 June ) Editorials. Are selective COX 2 inhibitors superior to traditional non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs? Adequate analysis of the CLASS trial indicates that this may not be the case. Peter Jüni, Anne WS Rutjes, Paul A Dieppe.
(8) http://www.adrugrecall.com/celebrex/celebrex.html Celebrex arthritis drug entered the U.S. marketed in January 1999. The FDA began to send Celebrex manufacture, Pharmacia, warnings that the agency was concerned with the promotional advertisements that were misrepresenting the safety of Celebrex. FDA letter to the drug company on April 6, 2000.
(9) http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/40105.php NEXIUM(R) Shown To Reduce Gastric Ulcers In At-Risk Patients Using Long-Term NSAIDs Each year, there are an estimated 103,000 hospitalizations and 16,500 deaths in the United States attributed to complications from NSAID-associated gastric ulcers.(5) Among the elderly, NSAID use accounts for nearly one third of gastric-ulcer-related hospitalizations,(6) with an associated four-fold increased risk of death.(7)
(10) https://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/extract/341/18/1397 Wolfe M, Lichtenstein R, Singh G. Gastrointestinal toxicity of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. N Engl J Med 1999;340:1888-1899.
(11) http://www.annals.org/cgi/content/full/127/6/429 Unnecessary Prescribing of NSAIDs and the Management of NSAID-Related Gastropathy in Medical Practice by Robyn Tamblyn, PhD; Laeora Berkson, MD, 15 September 1997, Volume 127 Issue 6, Pages 429-438
(12) http://gut.bmj.com/cgi/reprint/52/4/600.pdf Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: overall risks and management. Complementary roles for COX-2 inhibitors and proton pump inhibitors by C J Hawkey, M J S Langman Gut 2003;52:600-608
(13) http://www.senate.gov/~finance/hearings/testimony/2004test/111804dgtest.pdf David Graham Senate Testimony November 2004. Dr. Eric Topol at the Cleveland Clinic recently estimated up to 160,000 cases of heart attacks and strokes due to Vioxx, in an article published in the New England Journal of Medicine
(14) http://ww2.arthritis.org/conditions/alttherapies/Glucosamine.asp What are Glucosamine and Chondroitin Sulfate? Arthritis Foundation
(15) http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/short/354/8/795 Volume 354:795-808 February 23, 2006 Number 8 Glucosamine, Chondroitin Sulfate, and the Two in Combination for Painful Knee Osteoarthritis. Daniel O. Clegg, M.D., Domenic J. Reda, Ph.D., Crystal L. Harris, Pharm.D., Marguerite A. Klein, M.S., James R. O'Dell, M.D., Michele M. Hooper, M.D., John D. Bradley, M.D., Clifton O. Bingham, III, M.D., Michael H. Weisman, M.D., Christopher G. Jackson, M.D., Nancy E. Lane, M.D., John J. Cush, M.D., Larry W. Moreland, M.D., H. Ralph Schumacher, Jr., M.D., Chester V. Oddis, M.D., Frederick Wolfe, M.D., Jerry A. Molitor, M.D., David E. Yocum, M.D., Thomas J. Schnitzer, M.D., Daniel E. Furst, M.D., Allen D. Sawitzke, M.D., Helen Shi, M.S., Kenneth D. Brandt, M.D., Roland W. Moskowitz, M.D., and H. James Williams, M.D. (16) http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jay-gordon/did-you-understand-the-ar_b_16399.html Jay Gordon, MD Did You Understand the Arthritis Study? I Did. February 26, 2006 Huffington Post.
Jeffrey Dach MD 4700 Sheridan Suite T Hollywood Fl 33021 954-983-1443 www.jeffreydach.com www.drdach.com www.naturalmedicine101.com www.truemedmd.com
Link to this article: http://jeffreydach.com/2007/05/22/glucosamine-and-chondroitin-for-arthritis-pain-by-jeffrey-dach-md.aspx
Disclaimer click here: http://www.drdach.com/wst_page20.html
The reader is advised to discuss the comments on these pages with his/her personal physicians and to only act upon the advice of his/her personal physician Also note that concerning an answer which appears as an electronically posted question, I am NOT creating a physician -- patient relationship. Although identities will remain confidential as much as possible, as I can not control the media, I can not take responsibility for any breaches of confidentiality that may occur .
(c) 2007-2008-2009-2010 copyright all rights reserved Jeffrey Dach MD This article may be copied or reproduced on the internet provided a link and credit is given. |
No study so far has found any serious side effects from either glucosamine or chondroitin which are great supporters of joint health and are substances found naturally in the body.
For more information about glucosamine see my web site:
specialistarthritis.com regards, Paul
Reply to this
I did look into this issue a while back. My memory of it initially involves one "Peter Yost" (who had been a pharmaceutical company executive if I recall correctly) at Huffington Post but he had some mix up with Arianna Huffington and was dumped from the blog and strangely doesn't seem to exist anymore, at least in terms of Google.
But there are other links -
The New England Journal of Medicine article on a study -
Glucosamine, Chondroitin Sulfate, and the Two in Combination for Painful
Knee Osteoarthritis [Abstract only]
http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/short/354/8/795
Study: Supplements Fail to Ease Arthritis By ALICIA CHANG, AP Science Writer [February 23, 2006, 12:38AM EST]
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060223/ap_on_he_me/diet_arthritis
The description of the study in the AP article -
--------------------------------------------------
In the government study, funded by the National Institutes of Health,
1,583 patients with arthritis knee pain received one of five treatments:
either glucosamine or chondroitin, a combination of both, the painkiller
Celebrex or dummy pills. Neither the doctors nor patients knew which
treatment was given.
After six months, patients filled out a questionnaire to determine how
many felt a 20 percent reduction in pain. Researchers found the
supplements when taken alone or together were no more effective than
dummy pills at pain relief.
Sixty percent who took the dummy medication had reduced pain compared
with 64 percent who took glucosamine, 65 percent who took chondroitin
and 67 percent who took the combo pills. These differences were so small
that they could have occurred by chance alone.
The drug Celebrex did reduce pain — 70 percent reported improvement —
affirming the study's validity. However, the drug is being studied to
see if it's safe for people at risk of heart problems.
Of the 354 people with moderate to severe pain, 79 percent who took both
supplements reported relief compared with 54 percent who took the dummy
pills and 69 percent who took Celebrex. In a journal editorial, Dr. Marc Hochberg of the University of Maryland noted the study's limitations: a high dropout rate (20 percent) and a whopping 60 percent who said the dummy pills made them feel better — double the usual placebo effect.
Hochberg has received consulting fees from Pfizer Inc., which makes Celebrex, and Merck & Co., which made Vioxx.
Clegg and 10 other researchers in the study reported receiving fees or grant support from Pfizer or McNeil Consumer & Specialty Pharmaceuticals, which makes Tylenol.
The Council for Responsible Nutrition, which represents dietary supplement makers, said it was pleased about the positive findings in the severe arthritis group.
--------------------------------------------------
Note that this study involves a questionnaire to describe how the patients "felt." Mentioned in the article was the abnormally high rate of placebo effect for patients with less than moderate to severe pain. My take on this is that the results for those patients were bullshit. They didn't have much pain and so their impressions of benefit could only be vague.
But look at the results for patients with "moderate to severe pain." The placebo effect is just about gone (only 54% reported improvement) but the described benefit for the G-C combination shoots up to 79%. This is much higher than that for the pharmaceutical remedy. Note that there's no mention of the billions to be made by pharmaceutical companies on arthritis treatments and in particular with regard to this issue and Celebrex, one pharmaceutical company. In contrast, though the market for
the G-C may be large, it is also open much like the huge market for bottled water.
Yet this study concluded:
--------------------------------------------------
"Glucosamine and chondroitin sulfate alone or in combination did not reduce pain effectively in the overall group of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. Exploratory analyses suggest that the combination of glucosamine and chondroitin sulfate may be effective in the subgroup of patients with moderate-to-severe knee pain."
--------------------------------------------------
But look at the study's figures for Celebrex.
If G-C "may be effective", then Celebrex is a joke since it doesn't even approach the G-C "may be" effectiveness.
A link I did find at Huffington Post -
Did You Understand the Arthritis Study? I Did
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jay-gordon/did-you-understand-the-ar_b_...
From this Huffington Post post
--------------------------------------------------
Here's a complete list of the disclosure of financial ties the study's
authors have to the drug industry:
Drs. Bingham, Brandt, Clegg, Hooper, and Schnitzer report having received consulting fees or having served on advisory boards for McNeil Consumer and Specialty Pharmaceuticals.
Drs. Brandt, Moskowitz, Schnitzer, and Schumacher report having received consulting fees or having served on advisory boards for Pfizer.
Dr. Brandt reports having equity interests in Pfizer.
Drs. Moskowitz and Weisman report having received lecture fees from Pfizer; Dr. Brandt, lecture fees from McNeil Consumer and Specialty Pharmaceuticals;
Drs. Bingham, Clegg, Hooper, Jackson, Molitor, Sawitzke, and Schnitzer, grant support from Pfizer; and Dr. Bingham, grant support from McNeil Consumer and Specialty
Pharmaceuticals.
Dr. Brandt reports having received royalties from books
related to osteoarthritis.
Dr. Moskowitz reports having served as an expert consultant for Pfizer.
No other potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
The doctors and scientists who conducted this study receive millions
from the companies whose drugs they studied.
--------------------------------------------------
posted by anonymous
Reply to this